Jogos a Dinheiro – Rede de Responsabilidade Social

2016: Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling: Prevalence, Current Issues, and Concerns

Adolescent Gambling and Problem Gambling: Prevalence, Current Issues, and Concerns

Autores: Paul Delfabbro, Daniel L. King, Jeffrey L. Derevensky

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The prevalence of adolescent gambling and problem gambling and a number of emerging issues impacting adolescent problem gambling are explored.

Recent Findings

International studies of youth suggest that in spite of prohibitions, underage individuals are engaged in a wide array of gambling activities, with between 4 and 8 % experiencing significant gambling-related problems. Youth gambling preferences are often dependent upon their availability, accessibility, and social acceptability. Emerging trends and concerns are focused upon online gambling, simulated forms of gambling, and the promotion of gambling through social media.

Summary

While adolescent problem gamblers are not a homogeneous group, there is clear evidence that multiple factors play an important role in the prevalence, age of onset, and types of gambling in which youth participate. Technological advances through the increased accessibility of online and digital technologies present new gambling opportunities for youth.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Shaffer HJ, Hall MN, Vander BJ. Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a research synthesis. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1369–76. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.•
    Volberg RA, Gupta R, Griffiths MD, Ólason DT, Delfabbro P. An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010;22(1):3–38. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the adolescent gambling literature up until 2010. It includes separate summaries of findings from different parts of the world as well as conclusions, methodological commentary and suggestions for future researchPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambos C, Delfabbro PH, Pulgies S. Adolescent gambling in South Australia. Report prepared on behalf of the Department for Education and Children’s Services for the Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia. 2007.
  4. 4.•
    Räsänen T, Lintonen T, Konu A. Gambling and problem behavior among 14- to 16-year-old boys and girls in Finland. J Gamb Issues. 2015;31:1–22. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2015.31.1. This study represents one of the largest ever adolescent gambling surveys to include gambling measures. In this study, 101,167 children in Grade 8 and 9 were sampled from a large School Health Promotion Study in FinlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.•
    Cook S, Turner NE, Ballon B, Paglia-Boak A, Murray R, Adlaf EM, et al. Problem gambling among Ontario students: associations with substance abuse, mental health problems, suicide attempts, and delinquent behaviours. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(4):1121–34. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9483-0. This study is one of the largest Canadian studies published in recent years and provided opportunities to examine the relationship between adolescent gambling and other at-risk behaviours and well-being measuresCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.•
    Forrest D, McHale IG. Gambling and problem gambling among young adolescents in Great Britain. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(4):607–22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9277-6. This paper describes one of the largest British surveys of adolescent gambling. It involves 8,958 students aged 11–15 years of age drawn from 201 randomly selected schools and uses validated measures such as the DSM-IV-MR-J and specifically examines whether young people had spent money on gambling in the previous 7 daysCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.•
    Hanss D, Mentzoni RA, Blaszczynski A, Molde H, Torsheim T, Pallesen S. Prevalence and correlates of problem gambling in a representative sample of Norwegian 17-Year-Olds. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(3):659–78. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9455-4. This study involved 2059 17-year olds identified randomly via a national registry search. This study highlights the diversity of methodologies in adolescent research in that this study uses the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) and asks about gambling in the previous monthCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.•
    Fröberg F, Hallqvist J, Tengström A. Psychosocial health and gambling problems among men and women aged 16–24 years in the Swedish National Public Health Survey. Eur J Pub Health. 2013;23(3):427–33. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks129. This study involved 2,223 school students surveyed in class from grade 6 to 10 and assessed problem gambling using the SOGS-RA and participation rates among Swedish youthCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.•
    Raisamo S, Halme J, Murto A, Lintonen T. Gambling-related harms among adolescents: a population-based study. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(1):151–9. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9298-9. This paper describes the findings of a national Finnish study (n = 4566) of 12–18 year olds from the Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Survey. The study examines gambling in the last 6 months and examines gambling-related harmCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    St-Pierre RA, Derevensky JL, Temcheff CE, Gupta R. Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: examination of an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15(3):506–25. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2015.1079640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.•
    Stinchfield R. Gambling among Minnesota public school students from 1992 to 2007: declines in youth gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(1):108–17. doi: 10.1037/a0021266. The Minnesota student survey has been conducted from 1992 to 2007 and has included a number of gambling-related questions and represents one of the few published studies showing trends in adolescent participation over two decadesCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abbott M. Links between gambling availability, participation and harm: a 28-year New Zealand case-study and relevant findings from Sweden and Victoria. Paper presented at the National Association for Gambling Studies Conference, Adelaide; 2015.
  13. 13.
    Floros G, Paradisioti A, Hadjimarcou M, Mappouras DG, Karkanioti O, Siomos K. Adolescent online gambling in Cyprus: associated school performance and psychopathology. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(2):367–84. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9424-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lupu V, Todirita IR. Updates of the prevalence of problem gambling in Romanian teenagers. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(1):29–36. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9296-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.•
    Spritzer DT, Rohde LA, Benzano DB, Laranjeira RR, Pinsky I, Zaleski M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of gambling problems among a nationally representative sample of Brazilian adolescents. J Gambl Stud. 2011;27(4):649–61. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9236-7. The paper describes the results of national Brazilian health survey that included 485 adolescents aged 14–17 years who described their involvement in gambling. The study used the DSM-IV-MR-J as its principal measure of pathological gamblingCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.••
    Martins SS, Lee GP, Kim JH, Letourneau EJ, Storr CL. Gambling and sexual behaviors in African-American adolescents. Addict Behav. 2014;39(5):854–60. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.002. This is one of the few studies which has examined the prevalence of adolescent gambling in minority populationsCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.••
    Carbonneau R, Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Tremblay RE. Variety of gambling activities from adolescence to age 30 and association with gambling problems: a 15‐year longitudinal study of a general population sample. Addiction. 2015;110(12):1985–93. doi: 10.1111/add.13083. This longitudinal analysis identified different gambling trajectories, including a high trajectory of young people (8%) who gambled on more activities at age 15 and who were found to be more likely to gamble more widely at age 30 and to experience problemsCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.••
    Delfabbro P, King D, Griffiths MD. From adolescent to adult gambling: an analysis of longitudinal gambling patterns in South Australia. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(3):547–63. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9384-7. This study is one of the few Australian studies to track adolescent gambling patterns from adolescence into adulthood. The paper examines the stability of gambling behaviours and the extent to which age 15 behaviour predicts subsequent behaviour CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jessor R. New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.•
    Derevensky JL, Gilbeau L. Adolescent gambling: twenty-five years of research. Can J Addict. 2015;6(2):4–12. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gupta R, Derevensky J. Defining and assessing binge gambling. JL Derevensky, DT Shek & J Merrick (Eds.), Youth Gambling: The Hidden Addiction. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2011:79–97.
  22. 22.
    Gupta R, Nower L, Derevensky JL, Blaszczynski A, Faregh N, Temcheff C. Problem gambling in adolescents: an examination of the Pathways Model. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(3):575–88. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hardoon K, Derevensky J, Gupta R. Empirical vs. perceived measures of gambling severity: why adolescents don’t present themselves for treatment. Addict Behav. 2003;28:933–46. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission (AADAC). Gambling among Alberta youth: The Alberta youth experience Survey 2005; 2007. http://www.aadac.com/documents/TAYES05_gambling_among_alberta_youth.pdf
  25. 25.
    Derevensky JL, Gupta R. Internet gambling amongst adolescents: a growing concern. IJMA. 2007;5(2):93–101.Google Scholar
  26. 26.••
    Wood RT, Williams RJ. Internet gambling: prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Final report prepared for the Ontario problem gambling research centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 2009. Findings from a large Canadian and international survey, including a total of more than 20,000 respondents, are presented. The survey involved measurement of Internet and land-based gambling activities.
  27. 27.••
    Gainsbury S, King D, Delfabbro P, Hing N, Russell A, Blaszczynski A, Derevensky J. The use of social media in gambling. Gambling Research Australia. 2015. This report summarizes a major Australian government-funded project on the various intersections of gambling and social media. One of its objectives was to identify the exposure and use of social media and gambling products. It features a large survey of adolescent gambling activities in social media and land-based activities.
  28. 28.
    King, D. L. & Delfabbro, P. H. [unpublished]). Parental supervision of adolescents’ commercial and simulated gambling activities. Manuscript under review.
  29. 29.••
    King DL, Delfabbro PH, Kaptsis D, Zwaans T. Adolescent simulated gambling via digital and social media: an emerging problem. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;31:305–13. This paper summarises the findings from a survey of secondary school students in South Australia that examined both involvement in gambling for money as well as simulated gambling activitiesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Allen K, Madden J, Brooks K, Najman J. The Virtual Jackpot! The socio-cultural and environmental context of youth gambling. Report prepared for the Queensland Treasury; 2008. Retrieved online (20/2/2012) from: http://www.olgr.qld.gov.au/resources/responsibleGamblingDocuments/TheVirtualJackpot-TheSocioCulturalContextofYouthGamblingPhase1.pdf
  31. 31.•
    King DL, Delfabbro PH. Early exposure to digital simulated gambling: a review and conceptual model. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:198–206. This paper presents a conceptual model for the risks and protective factors associated with exposure simulated gambling activities. Clear guidelines for future research agendas are described, including discussion of mechanisms that might influence gambling behaviorCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    SuperData Research. Social casinos: the infographic. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.superdataresearch.com/blog/social-casino-the-infographic/.
  33. 33.
    Ipsos MORI. British survey of children, the national lottery and gambling 2008–09: report of a quantitative survey. London: National Lottery Commission; 2009. Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Griffiths MD, Wood RT. Adolescent Internet gambling: preliminary results of a national survey. Educ Health. 2007;25(2):23–7. Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Griffiths MD. Gaming convergence: further legal issues and psychosocial impact. Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2011;15(7–8):461–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    International Social Games Association. A snapshot of youth in the digital playground: Digsogames and Digsinos. 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.dropbox.com/s/f0w567da9v5q26t/ISGA%20Research%20%20A%20Snapshot%20of%20Youth%20in%20the%20Digital%20Playground.pdf?dl=0
  37. 37.
    Owens MD. If it isn’t gambling, how far should gaming regulation Go? Quasi-gambling, “Freemium”, and State Control. Gaming Law Rev Econ. 2013;17(7):506–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gainsbury S, Russell A, Hing N. An investigation of social casino gaming among land-based and Internet gamblers: a comparison of socio-demographic characteristics, gambling and co-morbidities. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;33:126–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gupta R, Derevensky JL, Wohl M. A qualitative examination of online gambling culture among college students: factors influencing participation, maintenance and cessation. Las Vegas: International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking; 2013. Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim HS, Wohl MJ, Salmon MM, Gupta R, Derevensky J. Do social casino gamers migrate to online gambling? An assessment of migration rate and potential predictors. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(4):1819–31. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Parke A, Harris A, Parke J, Rigbye J, Blaszczynski A. Responsible marketing and advertising in gambling: a critical review. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2015;8(3):21–35. Google Scholar
  42. 42.••
    Gainsbury S, Hing N, Delfabbro PH, King DL. A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14(2):196–213. This paper presents a useful summary of the taxonomic features of online gambling and gambling-like activities. There is a practice emphasis on features and boundaries between types of activitiesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    King DL, Gainsbury SM, Delfabbro PH, Hing N, Abarbanel B. Distinguishing between gaming and gambling activities in addiction research. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):215–20. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Humphreys A, Latour KA. Framing the game: assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. J Consum Res. 2013;40(4):773–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Derevensky JL, Gainsbury SM. Social casino gaming and adolescents: should we be concerned and is regulation in sight? Int J Law Psychiat. 2015.
Fonte: Springer

Related Posts

Leave A Response