Jogos a Dinheiro – Rede de Responsabilidade Social

Internet Gambling: An Online Empirical Study Among Student Gamblers

Título: Internet Gambling: An Online Empirical Study Among Student Gamblers
Autores: Mark Griffiths, Andrew Barnes
Data: 2008


It has been noted that the introduction of the Internet to gambling activities may change some of the fundamental situational and structural characteristics and make them potentially more addictive and/or problematic. This study examined some of the differences between Internet gamblers and non-Internet gamblers. Based on past literature it was hypothesised that (1) males would be significantly more likely to be Internet gamblers than females, (2) Internet gamblers would be significantly more likely to be problem gamblers than non-Internet gamblers, and (3) males would be significantly more likely to be problem Internet gamblers than females. A self-selected sample of 473 student respondents (213 males; 260 females) aged between 18 and 52 years (mean age  = 22 years; SD = 5.7 years) participated in an online survey. All three hypotheses were confirmed. The results suggest the structural and situational characteristics of Internet gambling may be having a negative psychosocial impact on Internet gambling. This is most notably because of increased number of gambling opportunities, convenience, 24-h access and flexibility, increased event frequencies, smaller intervals between gambles, instant reinforcements, and the ability to forget gambling losses by gambling again immediately. It is suggested that further research needs to be carried out into the effects that the Internet has in facilitating gambling behaviour.


  1. Griffiths, M. D. (1996). Gambling on the internet: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 471–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffiths, M. D. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 265–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Griffiths, M. D. (2001). Internet gambling: Preliminary results of the first UK prevalence study, Journal of Gambling Issues, 5 (Last accessed November 1, 2006).
  4. Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Gambling and gaming addictions in adolescence. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  5. Griffiths, M. D. (2003a). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns and recommendations. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 6, 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffiths, M. D. (2003b). Adolescent gambling: Risk factors and implications for prevention, intervention, and treatment. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 223–238). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths, M. D. (2005). Online therapy for addictive behaviors. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 555–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths, M. D. (2006). Internet gambling: What can looking at the past tell us about the future? Casino and Gaming International, 4, 37–43.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths, M. D., & Cooper, G. (2003). Online theraphy: Implications for problem gamblers and clinicians. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 13, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of Internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts, Gaming Research and Review Journal, 27(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
  12. Griffiths, M. D., & Wood, R. T. A. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, video game paying and the Internet. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 199–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayer, T., Griffiths, M. D., & Meyer, G. (2005). The prevention and treatment of problem gambling in adolescence. In T. P. Gullotta, & G. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent behavioral problems: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (pp. 467–486). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Ialomiteanu, A., & Adalf, E. (2001). Internet gambling among Ontario adults. Journal of Gambling Issues, 5http://www.camh. net/egambling/issue5/research/ialomiteanu_adalf_article.html (Last accessed November 1, 2006).
  15. Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on Internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours, 16, 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. R. (1994). Access to gambling opportunities and compulsive gambling. International Journal of Addictions, 29, 1611–1616.Google Scholar
  17. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Parke, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Why Internet gambling prohibition will ultimately fail. Gaming Law Review, 8, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sproston, K, Erens, B, & Orford, J. (2000). Gambling behaviour in Britain: Results from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
  21. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: Methodological issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, in press.Google Scholar
  23. Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology and Behavior, in press.Google Scholar


Fonte: Springer
Rede de Responsabilidade Social

Related Posts

Leave A Response